Glover, M. v. Udren Law Offices, 108 A.3d 28 (Pa. 2015). · Go Syfert
Search
Glover, M. v. Udren Law Offices, 108 A.3d 28 (Pa. 2015). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
9 citation events (9 in the last 25 years) across 2 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Glover, M. v. Udren Law Offices, 139 A.3d 195 (Pa. 2016)
How cited ↗
Cited for
q1 “does act 6, 502 provide a remedy, as the explicit language of the statute establishes, against any statutorily defined 'person' collecting statutorily prohibited fees on behalf of residential mortgage lenders?”0 citing cases2 citing courts quote it
    Other citing cases1 with no pin cite or quoted language on record
    Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
    Mary E. GLOVER, Individually and on Behalf of Other Similarly Situated Former and Current Homeowners in Pennsylvania, Petitioner
    v.
    UDREN LAW OFFICES, P.C., a New Jersey Debt Collector, Respondent
    334 WAL 2014 (Granted).
    Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.
    Jan 13, 2015.
    Published opinion
    108 A.3d 28
    2015 Pa. LEXIS 48
    Per Curiam.
    Cited by 4 opinions  |  Published

    ORDER

    PER CURIAM.

    AND NOW, this 13th day of January, 2015, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED. The issue, as stated by petitioners, is:

    (1) Does Act 6, § 502 provide a remedy, as the explicit language of the statute establishes, against any statutorily defined “person” collecting statutorily prohibited fees on behalf of residential mortgage lenders?

    The Application to File Supplement to Petition for Allowance of Appeal is DISMISSED as moot.