Chiswick Prods., Ltd. v. The Ss Stolt Avance, 387 F.2d 645 (5th Cir. 1968). · Go Syfert
Chiswick Prods., Ltd. v. The Ss Stolt Avance, 387 F.2d 645 (5th Cir. 1968). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
1 citation event across 1 distinct court.
Cited for

No citing cases on record.

Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
CHISWICK PRODUCTS, LTD., Et Al., Appellants,
v.
the SS STOLT AVANCE Et Al., Appellees
23830.
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit.
Jan 5, 1968.
Published opinion
387 F.2d 645
1968 U.S. App. LEXIS 8515
James E. Ross, Houston, Tex., for appellants., Fred Galindo, Brownsville, Tex., William C. Bullard, Houston, Tex., William J. Walker, New York City, for appellees.
Hutcheson, Jones, Per Curiam, Wisdom.
Cited by 1 opinion  |  Published
PER CURIAM:

Libel was instituted by appellants to recover for damage to a cargo of turpentine, incurred during its shipment from Brownsville, Texas,, to Europe aboard the SS Stolt Avance. Appellants made a prima facie case for recovery against the ship and her owners by introducing clean bills of lading and the stipulation that the cargo, when discharged, was damaged by suspended rust particles. Respondents defended on the ground that they had used due diligence in assuring the seaworthiness of the vessel prior to loading, and that the damage had been caused by Hurricane Carla, a peril of the sea.

The District Court, in its opinion reported at 257 F.Supp. 91, accepted the view of Respondents and adjudged them[*646] not liable. Only the findings of fact are challenged on this appeal. We find ample support in the evidence for the thorough summary of the Court below; Appellants’ challenge falls far short of demonstrating clear error. McAllister v. United States, 348 U.S. 19, 20, 75 S.Ct. 6, 99 L.Ed. 20 (1954); C. J. Dick Towing Co. v. The Leo, 202 F.2d 850 (5th Cir. 1953). The judgment is

Affirmed.