James S. Pacheco v. Matthew Carberry, 389 F.2d 93 (9th Cir. 1968). · Go Syfert
Search
James S. Pacheco v. Matthew Carberry, 389 F.2d 93 (9th Cir. 1968). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
1 citation event across 1 distinct court.
How cited ↗
Cited for

No citing cases on record.

Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
James S. PACHECO, Appellant,
v.
Matthew CARBERRY Et Al., Appellees
21669.
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit.
Jan 16, 1968.
Published opinion
389 F.2d 93
Edward L. Cragen (argued), James S. Pacheco, San Francisco, Cal., for appellant., Carl S. Mayer, Deputy Atty. Gen., (argued), Thomas C. Lynch, Atty. Gen. of California, Robert R. Granucci, Deputy Atty. Gen., San Francisco, Cal.,- for appellees.
Chambers, Pope, Duniway.
Published
PER CURIAM:

Appellant’s petition for a writ of habe-as corpus was dismissed in the district court. He appeals.

One of his points is appropriate for decision here now. That is his attack on the state search warrant and the fruits thereof. We find the warrant on the facts here not infirm, but valid under United States v. Ventresca, 380 U.S. 102, 85 S.Ct. 741, 13 L.Ed.2d 684.

As to all other points raised here, we find Pacheco has not exhausted his state remedies.

Affirmed.