Mahala Ashley Dickerson v. Richard Gantz, 389 F.2d 387 (9th Cir. 1968). · Go Syfert
Mahala Ashley Dickerson v. Richard Gantz, 389 F.2d 387 (9th Cir. 1968). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
1 citation event across 1 distinct court.
Cited for

No citing cases on record.

Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Mahala Ashley DICKERSON, Appellant,
v.
Richard GANTZ, James Delaney, Jr., George Hayes, Robert Erwin, and David Thorsness, Appellees
21302.
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit.
Mar 26, 1968.
Published opinion
389 F.2d 387
M. Ashley Dickerson (argued), Anchorage, Alaska, in pro. per., W. C. Arnold (argued), Anchorage, Alaska, for appellee.
Chambers, Jertberg, Koelsch, Per Curiam.
Published
PER CURIAM:

Appellant is an Anchorage lawyer. At one time state grievance proceedings were pending against her. They have been dismissed by stipulation. She has a certificate of good standing now. And, the old proceedings are dead.

Yet, she still pursues a district attorney and members of the state bar committee on various theories for their fruitless efforts. On motion, her complaint was dismissed and she appeals.

We have reviewed the record and find no ruling of the district court clearly erroneous.

Affirmed.