Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Fischbach Trucking Co., 398 F.2d 352 (6th Cir. 1968). · Go Syfert
Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Fischbach Trucking Co., 398 F.2d 352 (6th Cir. 1968). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
4 citation events across 2 distinct courts.
Cited for
Other citing cases2 with no pin cite or quoted language on record
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Petitioner,
v.
FISCHBACH TRUCKING COMPANY, Respondent
17961.
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit.
Jul 12, 1968.
Published opinion
398 F.2d 352
1968 U.S. App. LEXIS 6129
John S. Irving, N. L. R. B., Washington, D. C., Arnold Ordman, General Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Associate General Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. General Counsel, Lawrence M. Joseph, Allen J. Berk, Attys., N. L. R. B., Washington, D. C., on brief, for petitioner., Joseph F. Cook, Akron, Ohio, Hershey, Browne, Wilson, Steel, Cook & Wolfe, Akron, Ohio, on brief, for respondent.
O'Sullivan, McCree, Cecil.
Cited by 4 opinions  |  Published

ORDER

This matter involves enforcement of an order of the NLRB which found respondent, Fischbach Trucking Company, guilty of violating Section 8(a) (1) and (3) of the NLRA. The Board’s order, which affirmed the hearing examiner, is reported at 159 NLRB 108. The facts are adequately reported in the decision of the hearing examiner and the order of the Board.

The respondent does not contest the finding that by reason of interrogations during an organization campaign an 8(a) (1) violation occurred. The 8(a) (3) violation is the consequence of the discharge of one Robert McCall, Jr., allegedly for union activities. The trial examiner, affirmed by the Board, credited all witnesses appearing for the union and discredited all witnesses appearing for the company. We cannot say, however, that his factual conclusions are without support on the record, considered as a whole.

We, therefore, affirm the order of the Board.

Entered by order of the Court.