Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Retail Clerks Int'l Ass'n, 404 F.2d 855 (9th Cir. 1968). · Go Syfert
Search
Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Retail Clerks Int'l Ass'n, 404 F.2d 855 (9th Cir. 1968). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
4 citation events across 3 distinct courts.
How cited ↗
Cited for

No citing cases on record.

Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
National Labor Relations Board, Petitioner,
v.
Retail Clerks International Association, Local Union No. 899, AFL-CIO, Et Al., Respondents
22515.
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit.
Dec 18, 1968.
Published opinion
404 F.2d 855
1968 U.S. App. LEXIS 4448
Arnold Ordman, Gen. Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Associate Gen. Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Washington, D. C., Michael N. Sohn, Washington, D. C., (argued) and Thomas Silfen, Washington, D. C., Paul A. Cas-sady, Director, NLRB, Los Angeles, Cal., for petitioner., Charles M. Arak, (argued), Robert M. Dohrmann, (argued) of Arnold, Smith & Schwartz, Los Angeles, Cal., for respondent., Ted R. Frame, (argued), of Frame & Courtney, Coalinga, Cal., for intervenor, State-Mart, Inc.
Browning, Duniway, Carter.
Cited by 4 opinions  |  Published
PER CURIAM:

The National Labor Relations Board petitions for enforcement of its order entered on July 23, 1967. The decision and order of the Board are reported at 166 N.L.R.B. No. 92. The trial examiner found that respondent union had violated section 8(b) (7) (C) of the National Labor Relations Act as amended, 29 U.S.C. § 158(b) (7) (C), by picketing stores of an unorganized employer for more than 30 days, without filing an election petition and with a proscribed recognitional objective. The Board adopted the findings, conclusions and recommendations of the examiner. We are persuaded that those findings and conclusions are correct.

The order will be enforced.