Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Levinson's Owl Rexall Drugs, Inc., 405 F.2d 494 (9th Cir. 1968).
Search
Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Levinson's Owl Rexall Drugs, Inc., 405 F.2d 494 (9th Cir. 1968). Book View Copy Cite
NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Petitioner,
v.
LEVINSON’S OWL REXALL DRUGS, INC., Respondent
22259_1.
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit.
Dec 4, 1968.
405 F.2d 494
Arnold Ordman, Gen. Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Associate Gen. Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Roy 0. Hoffman, Dir., N. L. R. B., Julius Rosenbaum (argued), Glen M. Bendixsen, Washington, D. C., for appellant., Laurence P. Corbett (argued), of Corbett & Welden, Berkeley, Cal., Carroll, Davis, Burdick & McDonough, San Francisco, Cal., for appellee.
Merrill, Browning, Hufstedler.
Cited by 2 opinions  |  Published
PER CURIAM:

The NLRB seeks enforcement of its order entered respecting respondent as reported at 161 N.L.R.B. No. 138.

While the Board might well have gone the other way (as the hearing examiner did), we find substantial evidence on the record as a whole to support the Board’s finding that respondent violated § 8(a) (3) and (1) of the National Labor Relations Act, 29 U.S.C. § 158(a) (3) and (1), by diseriminatorily discharging employee Beverly Marsh to discourage union membership and activity.

Accordingly the Board’s order is entitled to enforcement. It is so ordered.