United States of Am., for the Use & Benefit of Lee A. Tharpe v. Norfold Dredging Co., Etc., Defendants-Third-Party v. Nat'l Blasting Co., Inc., Third-Party Defendant-Fourth Party United Bonding Ins. Co., Etc., Third-Party Plaintiff-Fourth Party v. First Nat'l Bank of Venice, Fourth Party, 417 F.2d 634 (1st Cir. 1969). · Go Syfert
United States of Am., for the Use & Benefit of Lee A. Tharpe v. Norfold Dredging Co., Etc., Defendants-Third-Party v. Nat'l Blasting Co., Inc., Third-Party Defendant-Fourth Party United Bonding Ins. Co., Etc., Third-Party Plaintiff-Fourth Party v. First Nat'l Bank of Venice, Fourth Party, 417 F.2d 634 (1st Cir. 1969). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
2 citation events across 2 distinct courts.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
United States of America, for the Use and Benefit of Lee A. Tharpe
v.
Norfold Dredging Company, Etc., Defendants-Third-Party v. National Blasting Company, Inc., Third-Party Defendant-Fourth Party United Bonding Insurance Company, Etc., Third-Party Plaintiff-Fourth Party v. First National Bank of Venice, Fourth Party
27158_1.
Court of Appeals for the First Circuit.
Dec 29, 1969.
417 F.2d 634
Published

417 F.2d 634

UNITED STATES of America, for the Use and Benefit of Lee A.
THARPE, et al., Plaintiffs,
v.
NORFOLD DREDGING COMPANY, etc., et al.,
Defendants-Third-Party Plaintiffs-Appellees, v.
NATIONAL BLASTING COMPANY, Inc.,
Third-Party Defendant-Fourth
Party Plaintiff.
UNITED BONDING INSURANCE COMPANY, etc., Third-Party
Plaintiff-Fourth Party Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
FIRST NATIONAL BANK OF VENICE, Fourth Party Defendant-Appellee.

No. 27158.

United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit.

Oct. 31, 1969, Rehearing Denied Dec. 29, 1969.

D. Lloyd Zook, Miami, Fla., for appellant.

W. Robert Mann, Bradenton, Fla., David A. Rhodes, Palmetto, Fla., L. Howard Payne, Venice, Fla., for appellees.

Before TUTTLE, WISDOM, and BELL, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

1

For the reasons stated in the trial judge's Consolidated Final Judgment and in the Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law, the judgment is affirmed.