Justin Lee Edwards v. State, No. 03-06-00226-CR (Tex. App.—Austin Jan. 19, 2007). · Go Syfert
Justin Lee Edwards v. State, No. 03-06-00226-CR (Tex. App.—Austin Jan. 19, 2007). Book View Copy Cite
No syfertize treatment data for this case.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Justin Lee Edwards
v.
State
03-06-00226-CR.
Court of Appeals of Texas.
Jan 19, 2007.
Unpublished opinion
Published
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03-06-00226-CR

Justin Lee Edwards, Appellant

v.

The State of Texas, Appellee

FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF WILLIAMSON COUNTY, 277TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT NO. 05-158-K277, HONORABLE KEN ANDERSON, JUDGE PRESIDING

MEMORANDUM OPINION

A jury found appellant Justin Lee Edwards guilty of aggravated sexual assault of a child. See Tex. Penal Code Ann. § 22.021 (West Supp. 2006). The jury assessed punishment, enhanced by a previous conviction for indecency with a child, at life imprisonment.

Appellant’s court-appointed attorney filed a brief concluding that the appeal is frivolous and without merit. The brief meets the requirements of Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), by presenting a professional evaluation of the record demonstrating why there are no arguable grounds to be advanced. See also Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75 (1988); High v. State, 573 S.W.2d 807 (Tex. Crim. App. 1978); Currie v. State, 516 S.W.2d 684 (Tex. Crim. App. 1974); Jackson v. State, 485 S.W.2d 553 (Tex. Crim. App. 1972); Gainous v. State, 436 S.W.2d 137 (Tex. Crim. App. 1969). Appellant received a copy of counsel’s brief and the appellate record and filed a pro se brief.

We have reviewed the record, counsel’s brief, and the pro se brief. We find nothing in the record that might arguably support the appeal. See Bledsoe v. State, 178 S.W.3d 824, 826-27 (Tex. Crim. App. 2005).

The judgment of conviction is affirmed.

___________________________________________ Jan P. Patterson, Justice Before Justices Patterson, Pemberton and Waldrop Affirmed Filed: January 19, 2007 Do Not Publish