Seapak v. Indus., Technical & Prof'l Employees, 423 F.2d 1229 (5th Cir. 1970). · Go Syfert
Search
Seapak v. Indus., Technical & Prof'l Employees, 423 F.2d 1229 (5th Cir. 1970). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
34 citation events (17 in the last 25 years) across 17 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Int'l Assoc. of Machin v. Ray Allen, No. 17-1178 (7th Cir. Sept. 13, 2018)
Treatment trajectory · 1970 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1970 1998 2026
How cited ↗
Cited for
At page 1230 Affirming district court's opinion per curiam3 citing cases1 listed here
  • Int'l Assoc. of Machin v. Ray Allen, No. 17-1178 (7th Cir. Sept. 13, 2018).published 3 cites
    The Fifth Circuit affirmed per curiam, adopting the district court’s opinion. 423 F.2d 1229, 1230 (5th Cir. 1970).
Other citing cases1 with no pin cite or quoted language on record
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
SEAPAK, a Division of W. R. Grace Corp., Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
INDUSTRIAL, TECHNICAL AND PROFESSIONAL EMPLOYEES, a Division of National Maritime Union, AFL-CIO, Defendant-Appellee
28414.
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit.
Apr 29, 1970.
Published opinion
423 F.2d 1229
John Bacheller, Jr., John B. Shepard, Atlanta, Ga., John Gayner, III, Bennet, Gilbert, Gilbert & Whittle, Brunswick, Ga., and Fisher & Phillips, Atlanta, Ga., for appellant., Stanley B. Gruber, Abraham E. Freedman, New York City, Q. Robert Henry, Brunswick, Ga., for appellee.
Simpson, Morgan, Ingraham.
Cited by 21 opinions  |  Published
PER CURIAM:

Seapak filed suit below against Industrial Technical and Professional Employees, a division of the National Maritime Union, seeking a declaratory judgment that it was not in violation of its collective bargaining agreement with the union. A breach of contract action pursuant to Title 29, U.S.C. § 185(a), filed by the union on the same date in the Southern District of New York, was transferred to the Southern District of Georgia under Title 28, U.S.C. § 1404(a). Upon cross-motions for summary judgment, the district court denied Seapak’s motion and granted summary judgment in favor of the union. This appeal followed.

The opinion-order of Chief Judge Lawrence, Seapak, a Division of W. R. Grace Corporation v. Industrial, Technical and Professional Employees, Division of National Maritime Union, AFL-CIO, 300 F.Supp. 1197 (1969), sets forth the background of the controversy and ably and adequately explicates the reasons for his decision. We adopt his opinion.

Affirmed.