No syfertize treatment data for this case.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
UNITED STATES of America, Appellee,
v.
David Valadez RODRIGUEZ, Appellant
v.
David Valadez RODRIGUEZ, Appellant
24370.
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit.
Apr 10, 1970.
Published opinion
David Marcus, Paul J. Geragos, Los Angeles, Cal., for appellant., David P. Curnow, Asst. U. S. Atty., Robert L. Brosio, Asst. U. S. Atty., Wm. Matthew Byrne, Jr., U. S. Atty., Los Angeles, Cal., for appellee.
Chambers, Trask, Jameson.
Published
PER CURIAM:
The judgment of conviction is affirmed.
The points on appeal in this narcotics case concern the sufficiency of the evidence of delivery, the admissibility of evidence of statements of a co-defendant, no conspiracy being charged, and the jury instructions.
The evidence as to delivery was conflicting. The jury was justified in accepting the government’s version. The statements of the co-defendant meet the[*303] tests for admissibility as enunciated in Fuentes v. United States, 9 Cir., 283 F. 2d 537.
The jury instructions were never objected to in the trial court. Finding no error in them, we need not consider whether they were plain error.