Harold Lewis Peek, Jr. v. United States of Am., 438 F.2d 534 (9th Cir. 1971). · Go Syfert
Search
Harold Lewis Peek, Jr. v. United States of Am., 438 F.2d 534 (9th Cir. 1971). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
1 citation event across 1 distinct court.
How cited ↗
Cited for

No citing cases on record.

Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Harold Lewis PEEK, Jr., Petitioner-Appellant,
v.
UNITED STATES of America Et Al., Respondents-Appellees
25044.
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit.
Apr 16, 1971.
Published opinion
438 F.2d 534
Harold Lewis Peek, in pro. per., Stan Pitkin, U. S. Atty., Charles W. Billinghurst, Asst. U. S. Atty., Tacoma, Wash., for appellees.
Browning, Trask, Pregerson.
Published
PER CURIAM:

The district court dismissed petitioner’s motion under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 on the ground that the contentions it raised had been determined adversely to petitioner on his prior motions. See Sanders v. United States, 373 U.S. 1, 83 S.Ct. 1068,[*535] 10 L.Ed.2d 148 (1963); Gomez v. United States, 396 F.2d 323 (9th Cir. 1968). Petitioner has failed to demonstrate that the district court erred.

Affirmed.