United States v. Odell Andrews, 439 F.2d 155 (9th Cir. 1971). · Go Syfert
United States v. Odell Andrews, 439 F.2d 155 (9th Cir. 1971). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
4 citation events across 1 distinct court.
Cited for

No citing cases on record.

Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
United States of America, and
v.
Odell Andrews and Willie Sloan
26567.
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit.
Apr 13, 1971.
Published opinion
439 F.2d 155
1971 U.S. App. LEXIS 10780
Cited by 1 opinion  |  Published

439 F.2d 155

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff and Appellee,
v.
Odell ANDREWS and Willie Sloan, Appellants.

No. 26567.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

April 13, 1971.

Burton Marks, of Marks, Sherman & London, Beverly Hills, Cal., for appellant.

Robert L. Meyer, U.S. Atty., David R. Nissen, Chief, Crim. Div., Brain J. O'Neill, Asst. U.S. Atty., Los Angeles, Cal., for appellee.

Before CHAMBERS, HUFSTEDLER and WRIGHT, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

[*~155–156]1

The judgment of conviction after remand, 426 F.2d 1304, of this judge-tried case is affirmed.

2

We hold it was not necessary to have a whole new tiral or to let defendant a whole new trial or to let defendant of a judge.

3

A close parallel is found in the case of Campbell v. United States, 365 U.S. 85, 81 S.Ct. 421, 5 L.Ed.2d 428.