Michael George Emack v. State, No. 03-10-00290-CR (Tex. App.—Austin Aug. 26, 2011). · Go Syfert
Michael George Emack v. State, No. 03-10-00290-CR (Tex. App.—Austin Aug. 26, 2011). Book View Copy Cite
No syfertize treatment data for this case.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Michael George Emack
v.
State
03-10-00290-CR.
Court of Appeals of Texas.
Aug 26, 2011.
Unpublished opinion
Published
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03-10-00290-CR

Michael George Emack, Appellant

v.

The State of Texas, Appellee

FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF SCHLEICHER COUNTY, 51ST JUDICIAL DISTRICT NO. 998, HONORABLE BARBARA L. WALTHER, JUDGE PRESIDING

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Appellant Michael George Emack pleaded no contest to an indictment accusing him of bigamy. See Tex. Penal Code Ann. § 25.01 (West 2011). The district court adjudged him guilty and assessed punishment at seven years’ imprisonment, as called for in a plea bargain agreement. Appellant brings forward twenty-one points urging that the trial court erred by overruling his pretrial motion to suppress evidence.

This appeal is a companion to appellant’s appeal of his sexual assault conviction in Emack v. State, No. 03-10-00253-CR (Tex. App.—Austin Aug. 26, 2011, no pet. h.). The issues raised and the arguments made are identical in both causes. For the reasons stated in our opinion in cause number 03-10-00253-CR, we overrule appellant’s points of error and affirm the judgment of conviction.

__________________________________________

J. Woodfin Jones, Chief Justice

Before Chief Justice Jones, Justices Henson and Goodwin Affirmed Filed: August 26, 2011 Do Not Publish