United States v. Delgado, 36 F. App'x 490 (3d Cir. 2002). · Go Syfert
United States v. Delgado, 36 F. App'x 490 (3d Cir. 2002). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
No syfertize treatment data for this case.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
UNITED STATES of America,
v.
German DELGADO Appellant
01-3270.
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit.
Jun 11, 2002.
Unpublished opinion
36 F. App'x 490
Nygaard, Barry, Magill.
Unpublished

OPINION OF THE COURT

NYGAARD, Circuit Judge.

Appellant, German Delgado, challenges the extent of the downward departure granted by the District Court in determining his sentence. The District Court concluded that Delgado was entitled to a downward departure based upon his substantial assistance. Nonetheless, the court decided that a three-month departure was all that was indicated because appellant had an extensive history as a drug dealer and because there was a substantial quantity of the drugs involved in this offense. In effect, appellant is arguing that the District Court should have departed a total of fifteen months below his applicable Guideline range instead of three months.

We do not have appellate jurisdiction to review a challenge to the District Court’s discretionary decision, challenging the extent of a downward departure under U.S.S.G. § 5K1.1. See United States v. Torres, 251 F.3d 138, 145 (3d Cir.2001) (citing United States v. Parker, 902 F.2d 221, 222 (3d Cir.1990)). Thus, we will dismiss this appeal.