Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Holly Farms Poultry Indus., Inc., 455 F.2d 969 (4th Cir. 1972). · Go Syfert
Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Holly Farms Poultry Indus., Inc., 455 F.2d 969 (4th Cir. 1972). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
No syfertize treatment data for this case.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Petitioner,
v.
HOLLY FARMS POULTRY INDUSTRY, INC., Respondent
71-1771.
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit.
Feb 8, 1972.
Published opinion
455 F.2d 969
1972 U.S. App. LEXIS 11398
Peter G. Nash, Gen. Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Allison W. Brown, Jr., and A. Donald Rhoads, Washington, D. C., on brief for petitioner., Jesse S. Hogg, Miami, Fla., on brief for respondent.
Winter, Craven, Butzner.
Published
PER CURIAM:

This case is before us upon application of the National Labor Relations Board for enforcement of its order, reported at 187 NLRB No. 116, finding that the respondent, Holly Farms Poultry Industry, Inc., violated § 8(a) (1) and (3) of the National Labor Relations Act by discharging employees William H. Key, Jr., and Betty Lee Wagoner because of their activities on behalf of the union. The respondent contends that both Key and Wagoner were discharged[*970] not for their union activity but rather because of their solicitation on behalf of the union during working hours in violation of a company rule barring such solicitation. Respondent admits that credibility resolutions are peculiarly within the province of the Trial Examiner and the Board. It asserts, however, that a clear preponderance of the relevant evidence demonstrates that those credibility findings are incorrect.

We see no merit in the respondent’s contentions since an examination of the record as a whole discloses substantial evidence in support of the Trial Examiner’s findings with respect to the discharges of both Key and Wagoner. Universal Camera Corp. v. NLRB, 340 U.S. 474, 71 S.Ct. 456, 95 L.Ed. 456 (1951).

Accordingly, we dispense with oral argument and enforce the Board’s order.

Enforcement granted.