Everett Graves v. Florida Prob. & Parole Comm'n, 456 F.2d 1300 (5th Cir. 1972). · Go Syfert
Everett Graves v. Florida Prob. & Parole Comm'n, 456 F.2d 1300 (5th Cir. 1972). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
No syfertize treatment data for this case.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Everett GRAVES, Petitioner-Appellant,
v.
FLORIDA PROBATION AND PAROLE COMMISSION, STATE OF FLORIDA, Respondent-Appellee
71-3174.
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit.
Mar 24, 1972.
Published opinion
456 F.2d 1300
1972 U.S. App. LEXIS 10521
Everett Graves, pro se., Robert L. Shevin, Atty. Gen. of Fla., Tallahassee, Fla., for respondent-appel-lee.
Brown, Goldberg, Morgan.
Published
PER CURIAM:

Everett Graves, an inmate of the Florida State Penitentiary at Raiford, filed a Federal civil rights complaint under 42 U.S.C.A. § 1983, seeking injunc-tive relief against the Florida Probation and Parole Commission. He alleged in effect that the agency operated in an unconstitutionally discriminatory manner by denying parole opportunities to otherwise eligible candidates solely because of their race, religion, nationality and sex. The District Court dismissed the complaint on the theory that Graves lacked standing to sue, since he had not alleged that his own rights were jeopardized by the Commission’s allegedly unlawful action. In his motion for rehearing the petitioner did assert that his personal parole status was adversely affected, but without explicitly considering this claim or assigning written reasons for its action the District Court denied the motion.

Contrary to the rationale underlying the order of dismissal, Graves[*1301] clearly had standing to sue once he had amended his complaint to allege that he was the victim of a policy of racial discrimination allegedly adopted by the defendant. Association of Data Processing Service Organizations, Inc. v. Camp, 1970, 397 U.S. 150, 90 S.Ct. 827, 25 L. Ed.2d 184; Barlow v. Collins, 1970, 397 U.S. 159, 90 S.Ct. 832, 25 L.Ed.2d 192. For that reason we vacate the District Court’s order and remand for further consideration of the allegations raised in this complaint. Obviously we intimate no determination of the merits, if any.

Vacated and remanded.