United States v. David Rowe, No. 98-3687 (8th Cir. May 19, 1999). · Go Syfert
United States v. David Rowe, No. 98-3687 (8th Cir. May 19, 1999). Book View Copy Cite
No syfertize treatment data for this case.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
United States
v.
David Rowe
98-3687.
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit.
May 19, 1999.
Unpublished opinion
Unpublished
United States Court of Appeals
FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

No. 98-3687
United States of America,Appellee,v.David Allen Rowe,Appellant.
Appeals from the United States
No. 98-3805 District Court for the
___________ District of South Dakota.

United States of America, *
* [UNPUBLISHED]
Appellee, *
*
v. *
*
Michael Lee Kasdorf, *
*
Appellant. *

Submitted: May 11, 1999

Filed: May 19, 1999

Before MCMILLIAN, HEANEY, and FAGG, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

David Allen Rowe and Michael Lee Kasdorf were convicted by a jury for counterfeiting offenses and sentenced to fifty and twenty months, respectively. In this joint appeal, Rowe appeals the district court’s enhancement under U.S.S.G. § 2B5.1 and its imposition of periodic polygraph examinations as an additional condition of his supervised release. Kasdorf appeals the district court’s refusal to instruct the jury on the defense of coercion and its response to a jury question.

We have carefully reviewed the record and conclude that the district court committed no error. Because an extended discussion of the merits is unnecessary, we affirm on the basis of the district court’s ruling. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.

A true copy.

Attest.

CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.