Cummins Diesel Sales Corp. v. United States, 459 F.2d 668 (7th Cir. 1972). · Go Syfert
Cummins Diesel Sales Corp. v. United States, 459 F.2d 668 (7th Cir. 1972). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
5 citation events across 1 distinct court.
Cited for

No citing cases on record.

Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
CUMMINS DIESEL SALES CORPORATION, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
UNITED STATES of America, Defendant-Appellee
71-1378.
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit.
Apr 28, 1972.
Published opinion
459 F.2d 668
1972 U.S. App. LEXIS 9858
Walter W. Brudno, Dallas, Tex., William F. Welch, Indianapolis, Ind., Kil-gore & Kilgore, Dallas, Tex., McHale, Cook & Welch, Indianapolis, Ind., for plaintiff-appellant., Johnnie M. Walters, Asst. Atty. Gen., Virginia M. Hopkinson, Atty., Tax Div., U. S. Dept, of Justice, Washington, D. C., Stanley B. Miller, U. S. Atty., Indianapolis, Ind., Meyer Rothwacks, Paul M. Ginsburg, Attys., Tax Div., Dept, of Justice, Washington, D. C., for defendant-appellee.
Fairchild, Sprecher, Campbell.
Cited by 5 opinions  |  Published
PER CURIAM.

This is an appeal from a judgment for the United States in an action for refund of income taxes. Appellant taxpayer held preferred stock with provisions requiring cumulation of unpaid dividends. The stock was redeemed and sums paid to taxpayer were equal to par value plus accumulated, unpaid, accrued dividends, not previously declared. We agree with the district court, following a longstanding administrative interpretation, that since the dividends had not been declared prior to and independently of the corporate decision to redeem, the entire sums should be treated for tax purposes as distributions in exchange for[*669] the sto;k, resulting in a capital gain, and nopart should be treated as dividend ordinary income. Nothing need be added to the opinion of the district court. [2]

The judgment is affirmed.

2

. Cummins Diesel Sales Corp. v. United Sttaes, 323 F.Supp. 1114 (S.D.Ind., 1971).