Tracy Weldon Bosley v. Carl C. Hocker, Warden, 460 F.2d 1064 (9th Cir. 1972). · Go Syfert
Tracy Weldon Bosley v. Carl C. Hocker, Warden, 460 F.2d 1064 (9th Cir. 1972). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
9 citation events across 5 distinct courts.
Cited for
Other citing cases1 with no pin cite or quoted language on record
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Tracy Weldon BOSLEY, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
Carl C. HOCKER, Warden, Defendant-Appellee
26052.
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit.
Jul 13, 1972.
Published opinion
460 F.2d 1064
Tracy Weldon Bosley, in pro. per., Harvey Dickerson, Atty. Gen., Carson City, Nev., for defendant-appellee.
Koelsch, Ely, Turrentine.
Published
Reporter's Syllabus editorial summary, not part of the Court's opinion

Tracy Weldon Bosley, in pro. per.

Harvey Dickerson, Atty. Gen., Carson City, Nev., for defendant-appellee.

Before KOELSCH and ELY, Circuit Judges, and TURRENTINE, District Judge.*

PER CURIAM:

Lead Opinion

PER CURIAM:

The issues presented upon this appeal are identical to those which were recently resolved by our court in Mathis v. Hocker, 459 F.2d 988 (9th Cir. 1972). We are bound by that decision (see Etcheverry v. United States, 320 F.2d 873, 874 (9th Cir. 1963)); hence, the judgment of the District Court in this case is

Affirmed.

Concurrence

ELY, Circuit Judge

(concurring):

Under the compulsion of Mathis, I concur in the result. At the same time, however, I record my disagreement with the Mathis result and with some of the reasoning that produced it.