Airlift Int'l, Inc. v. United States, 460 F.2d 1065 (5th Cir. 1972). · Go Syfert
Search
Airlift Int'l, Inc. v. United States, 460 F.2d 1065 (5th Cir. 1972). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
9 citation events (1 in the last 25 years) across 4 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Vidal Suriel v. Comm'r of IRS, 599 F. App'x 929 (11th Cir. 2015)
How cited ↗
Cited for
Other citing cases1 with no pin cite or quoted language on record
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
AIRLIFT INTERNATIONAL, INC., Et Al., Plaintiffs-Appellants,
v.
UNITED STATES of America Et Al., Defendants-Appellees
72-1435.
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit.
Jun 9, 1972.
Published opinion
460 F.2d 1065
1972 U.S. App. LEXIS 9096
Walsh, Dolan & Krupniek, P. A., Fort Lauderdale, Fla., for appellant., L. Patrick Gray, III, Asst. Atty. Gen., Robert W. Rust, U. S. Atty., Morton Hollander, Judith S. Feigin, Dept, of Justice, Washington, D. C., for appellee.
Bell, Dyer, Clark.
Cited by 2 opinions  |  Published
PER CURIAM:

The single issue raised on this appeal is whether the trial court, in a non-jury action brought to recover certain damages under an insurance contract, committed reversible error in refusing to admit certain expert testimony concerning the scope of the contract’s coverage. We need not decide whether the court’s ruling amounted to an abuse of discretion, for if it were, such error would be harmless in light of the remaining uncontested findings of fact and conclusions of law. Cf. Cain et al. v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, 460 F.2d 1243 (5th Cir. 1972).

Affirmed.