Vincent Cannady v. First Comp, 366 F. App'x 720 (8th Cir. 2010). · Go Syfert
Vincent Cannady v. First Comp, 366 F. App'x 720 (8th Cir. 2010). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
No syfertize treatment data for this case.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Vincent Nathaniel CANNADY, Appellant,
v.
FIRST COMP, Appellee
09-1961.
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit.
Feb 25, 2010.
Unpublished opinion
366 F. App'x 720
Melloy, Bowman, Smith.
Unpublished
PER CURIAM.

Vincent Cannady appeals the district court’s [1] adverse grant of summary judgment in his pro se discrimination action against a prospective employer. After careful de novo review, see Arraleh v. County of Ramsey, 461 F.3d 967, 974 (8th Cir.2006) (standard of review), we conclude that summary judgment was proper for the reasons stated by the district court. Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.

1

. The Honorable Ortrie D. Smith, United States District Judge for the Western District of Missouri.