Michael Kriz appeals from the order of the District Court ^[1] granting summary judgment to the defendants in Kriz’s civil rights action. After careful de novo review, see Mayer v. Nextel W. Corp., 318 F.3d 803, 806 (8th Cir.) (standard of review), cert, denied, 540 U.S. 823, 124 S.Ct. 153, 157 L.Ed.2d 43 (2003), we reject Kriz’s arguments for reversal because the summary judgment record reveals no trial-worthy issue as to the alleged violation of his constitutional rights. Accordingly, we affirm.