August Williams v. C. Murray Henderson, 465 F.2d 995 (5th Cir. 1972). · Go Syfert
Search
August Williams v. C. Murray Henderson, 465 F.2d 995 (5th Cir. 1972). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
3 citation events across 2 distinct courts.
How cited ↗
Cited for

No citing cases on record.

Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
August WILLIAMS, Petitioner-Appellant,
v.
C. Murray HENDERSON, Warden, Louisiana State Penitentiary, Respondent-Appellee
71-2674.
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit.
Aug 16, 1972.
Published opinion
465 F.2d 995
1972 U.S. App. LEXIS 7887
Thomas F. Schexnayder, New Orleans, La. (Court-appointed), for petitioner-appellant., Jack P. F. Gremillion, Atty. Gen. of La., Baton Rouge, La., Maurice R. Franks, New Orleans, La., for respondent-appellee.
Brown, Rives, Clark.
Cited by 3 opinions  |  Published
PER CURIAM:

Petitioner was convicted on a Louisiana charge of aggravated rape and sen[*996] tenced to death. After exhausting State remedies, he filed the present § 2254 application for writ of habeas corpus which was denied by the District Court. We vacate and remand.

Petitioner asserts two constitutional grounds for setting aside his death penalty. The first of these, the Wither-spoon [1] issue, need not be confronted because recent Supreme Court pronouncement makes clear that his second contention, the assertion that the death penalty is cruel and unusual punishment in contravention of the Eighth Amendment, requires reconsideration of the Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus by the District Court. Accordingly, we vacate the District Court’s order and remand for reconsideration in light of Furman v. Georgia, 1972, 408 U.S. 238, 92 S.Ct. 2726, 33 L.Ed.2d 346 and companion cases.

Vacated and remanded.

1

. Witherspoon v. Illinois, 1968, 391 U.S. 510, 88 S.Ct. 1770, 20 L.Ed.2d 776. The issue here involved analysis of a Wither-spoon problem in light of La.C.Cr.P. Art. 799.