No syfertize treatment data for this case.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Oden Metro Turfing
v.
Plaquemine Contr
v.
Plaquemine Contr
01-41500.
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit.
Mar 21, 2003.
Unpublished opinion
Unpublished
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
No. 01-41500
ODEN METRO TURFING INC., ET AL.
Plaintiffs,
CONTINENTAL CASUALTY COMPANY
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
PLAQUEMINE CONTRACTING COMPANY INC., ET AL.
Defendants,
PLAQUEMINE CONTRACTING COMPANY INC.
Defendant-Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Eastern District of Texas
(00-CV-264)
March 20, 2003
Before BENAVIDES, STEWART, and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges.
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
No. 01-41500
ODEN METRO TURFING INC., ET AL.
Plaintiffs,
CONTINENTAL CASUALTY COMPANY
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
PLAQUEMINE CONTRACTING COMPANY INC., ET AL.
Defendants,
PLAQUEMINE CONTRACTING COMPANY INC.
Defendant-Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Eastern District of Texas
(00-CV-264)
March 20, 2003
Before BENAVIDES, STEWART, and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM*:
Appellant Plaquemine Contracting Company Inc. (“Plaquemine”) appeals the grant of summary judgment in favor of Appellee Continental Casualty Company (“Continental”) on Plaquemine’s Counterclaim for Tortious Interference and Continental’s claims under the Texas
*
Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.
Construction Trust Fund Act, TEX. PROP. CODE § 162.001. For the reasons essentially stated by the district court, the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.