United States v. John K. Briggs, 472 F.2d 1229 (5th Cir. 1973). · Go Syfert
Search
United States v. John K. Briggs, 472 F.2d 1229 (5th Cir. 1973). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
5 citation events across 3 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: United States v. Raul Fernandez-Alfonso, 816 F.2d 477 (9th Cir. 1987)
How cited ↗
Cited for
At page 1230 cited at this page2 citing cases
  • United States v. Raul Fernandez-Alfonso, 816 F.2d 477 (9th Cir. 1987).published
    Id.; United States v. Wong-Alvarez, 779 F.2d 583, 585 (11th Cir.1985); United States v. Briggs, 472 F.2d 1229, 1230 (5th Cir.1973).
  • United States v. Dorothy Wheeler, 795 F.2d 839 (9th Cir. 1986).published
    If a district court fails to comply with Rule 9(b), we will remand for the proper written findings, United States v. Wong-Alvarez, 779 F.2d 583, 585 (11th Cir. 1985); United States v. Bishop, 537 F.2d 1184, 1185-86 (4th Cir.1976); United S…
Other citing cases1 with no pin cite or quoted language on record
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
John K. BRIGGS Et Al., Defendants-Appellants
72-3459.
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit.
Jan 12, 1973.
Published opinion
472 F.2d 1229
1973 U.S. App. LEXIS 12183
Doris Peterson, Center for Constitutional Rights, New York City, James Reif, New York City, Morton Stavis, Newark, N. J., Nancy Stearns, New York City, Cameron Cunningham, Brady S. Coleman, Austin, Tex., Larry Turner, Gainesville, Fla., for defendants-appellants., William H. Stafford, Jr., U. S. Atty., Pensacola, Fla., for plaintiff-appellee.
Wisdom, Godbold, Roney.
Cited by 5 opinions  |  Published
PER CURIAM:

This is an appeal under the Bail Reform Act, 18 U.S.C. § 3147(b)(2), from the decision of the district court setting bail for each of the eight defendant-appellants in the amount of $10,000 cash or surety bond and denying defendants’ motion that they be released on their personal recognizance or in the custody of counsel or upon a 10% deposit of the amount fixed for their bond. The district court also denied defendants’ motions to deposit government securities in lieu of cash and for an evidentiary hearing as to the amount and conditions of the bond. The district court failed to state any reasons for imposing the conditions of release.

We remand the cause so that the district court may comply with Rule 9(a) of the Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure, which provides that the district court shall state in writing the reasons for imposing or refusing to impose conditions of release. See United States v. Estes, 5 Cir. 1972, 458 F.2d 1076; United States v. Cramer, 5 Cir. 1971, 451 F.2d 1198.

Remanded.