Allied Bitumens, Inc. v. United States, 485 F.2d 1237 (2d Cir. 1973). · Go Syfert
Allied Bitumens, Inc. v. United States, 485 F.2d 1237 (2d Cir. 1973). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
1 citation event across 1 distinct court.
Cited for

No citing cases on record.

Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Allied Bitumens, Inc.
v.
United States
223.
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit.
Nov 2, 1973.
Published opinion
485 F.2d 1237
1973 U.S. App. LEXIS 7234
Cited by 1 opinion  |  Published

485 F.2d 1237

73-2 USTC P 16,120

ALLIED BITUMENS, INC., Plaintiff-Appellee.
v.
UNITED STATES of America, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 223, Docket 73-1813.

United States Court of Appeals,
Second Circuit.

Argued Oct. 25, 1973.
Decided Nov. 2, 1973.

Louis A. Bradbury, Atty., Tax Div., Dept. of Justice, Washington, D. C. (Scott P. Crampton, Asst. Atty. Gen., Meyer Rothwacks and Elmer J. Kelsey, Attys., John T. Elfvin, U. S. Atty., for the Western District of New York, on the brief), for defendant-appellant.

Thomas J. Fori, Albany, N. Y. (Harry R. Hayes, Albany, N. Y., on the brief), for plaintiff-appellee.

Before SMITH, FEINBERG and OAKES, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

[*~1237–1238]1

The United States appeals from a judgment of $13,192.89 with interest for plaintiff taxpayer Allied Bitumens, Inc. after a trial in a tax refund suit in the United States District Court for the Western District of New York, before Judge John T. Curtin. The judge held that the asphalt distributors and slurry machines used by taxpayer in road construction and repair were not "highway motor vehicles" within 26 U.S.C. Sec. 4482(a) so as to be subject to the tax imposed by section 4481(a). We affirm substantially for the reasons set forth in Judge Curtin's opinion, 353 F.Supp. 1128 (W.D.N.Y.1973). Although the judge did not discuss the effect of the last sentence of the pertinent Treasury Regulation,[1] relied on heavily by the United States in this appeal, that sentence does not suggest a contrary result.

2

Judgment affirmed.