United States v. Kenneth Kang, 632 F. App'x 422 (9th Cir. 2016). · Go Syfert
Search
United States v. Kenneth Kang, 632 F. App'x 422 (9th Cir. 2016). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
No syfertize treatment data for this case.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
Kenneth Huidong KANG, Defendant-Appellant
14-10567.
Docket on CourtListener (RECAP)
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit.
Jan 28, 2016.
Unpublished opinion
632 F. App'x 422
Stephen Francis Leon Guerrero, Assistant U.S., Office of the U.S. Attorney, Ha-gatna, GU, for Plaintiff-Appellee., Edward C. Han, Esquire, Law Office of Edward C. Han, Hagatna, GU, for Defendant-Appellant.
Canby, Tashima, Nguyen.
Unpublished  |  Criminal
1 passage pin-cited by 1 case
Pinpoint authority: bottom 82%
Citer courts: U.S. Tax Court (1)

MEMORANDUM **

Kenneth Huidong Kang appeals from the district court’s judgment and challenges the six-month sentence imposed following his guilty-plea conviction for criminal conspiracy, in violation of 18 U.S.C. §§ 2 and 371, and harboring illegal aliens, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1324(a)(1)(A)(iii) and (a)(1)(B)(i). We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.

Kang argues that the district court erred by denying his request for a three-level mitigating role adjustment under U.S.S.G. § 3B1.2. We review a district court’s determination that a defendant did not have a mitigated role for clear error. See United States v. Rosas, 615 F.3d 1058, 1066 (9th Cir.2010). In light of the facts, including the length of Kang’s involvement in the conspiracy and his harboring of illegal aliens in his own home, the district court did not clearly err in denying the adjustment. See id. at 1067-68.

AFFIRMED.

**

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.