Gen. Motors Corp., Etc. v. Dade Bonded Warehouse, Inc., 498 F.2d 327 (5th Cir. 1974). · Go Syfert
Gen. Motors Corp., Etc. v. Dade Bonded Warehouse, Inc., 498 F.2d 327 (5th Cir. 1974). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
16 citation events across 6 distinct courts.
Cited for
At page 328 Procedure for appealing a district court judgment4 citing cases11 C. Wright & A. Miller, Federal Practice and Procedure: Civil § 2781; F.R.Civ.P. 58; 28 U.S.C. § 1291. See, e. g., Anderson v. Robinson, 5 Cir. 1974, 494…opening of page *328 (no citing court says what it cites this page for) · 3 listed here
  • LTV Corp. v. United Mine Workers (In re Chateaugay Corp.), 922 F.2d 86 (2d Cir. 1990).published 2 cites
    See General Motors Corp. v. Dade Bonded Warehouse, Inc., 498 F.2d 327, 328 (5th Cir.1974). . 28 U.S.C. § 158 (b) permits the establishment of a bankruptcy appellate panel and strictly limits the jurisdiction of that panel.
  • In Re Chateaugay Corp., 922 F.2d 86 (2d Cir. 1990).published
    See General Motors Corp. v. Dade Bonded Warehouse, Inc., 498 F.2d 327, 328 (5th Cir.1974). * Honorable Jane A. Restani, Judge, United States Court of International Trade, sitting by designation 1 28 U.S.C.
  • Metallurgical Indus., Inc. v. Fourtek, Inc., a Corp., & Irvin Bielefeldt, 771 F.2d 915 (5th Cir. 1985).published
    See General Motors Corp. v. Dade Bonded Warehouse, Inc., 498 F.2d 327, 328 (5th Cir.1974).
Other citing cases1 with no pin cite or quoted language on record
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
GENERAL MOTORS CORPORATION, Etc., Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
DADE BONDED WAREHOUSE, INC., Et Al., Defendants-Appellees
73-2652.
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit.
Aug 5, 1974.
Published opinion
498 F.2d 327
1974 U.S. App. LEXIS 7319
William G. Earle, Miami, Fla., for plaintiff-appellant., Harold C. Knecht, Jr., Coral Gables, Fla., for Moore Pipe & Sprinkler., Dan G. Wheeler, Jr., Miami, Fla., for Blanche R. Bergin., Hugh L. Wood, Jeanne Heyward, Miami, Fla., for Dade Bonded Warehouse.
Thornberry, Coleman, Ainsworth.
Cited by 15 opinions  |  Published
PER CURIAM:

In this action General Motors asserted claims against both Dade Bonded Warehouse, Inc. and Blanche R. Bergin, executrix of the estate of Cecil A. Bergin. Although the jury was charged on the various theories of liability possibly applicable to Bergin, their verdict did not mention the claim against her. Furthermore, a careful search of the record reveals that no judgment was ever entered on this claim, although the district court did deny General Motors’ motion for a new trial against Bergin. Thus the judgment fails to adjudicate all the claims and liabilities of all the parties, as required by F.R.Civ.P. 54(b). No certificate under F.R.Civ.P. 54(b) appears in the record. We therefore dismiss the appeal for want of jurisdiction.[*328] 11 C. Wright & A. Miller, Federal Practice and Procedure: Civil § 2781; F.R.Civ.P. 58; 28 U.S.C. § 1291. See, e. g., Anderson v. Robinson, 5 Cir. 1974, 494 F.2d 45; Foret v. McDermott, 5 Cir. 1973, 484 F.2d 992. See also, United States v. Indrelunas, 1973, 411 U.S. 216, 93 S.Ct. 1562, 36 L.Ed.2d 202; State National Bank of El Paso v. United States, 5 Cir. 1974, 488 F.2d 890.

Should the district court enter a new judgment on General Motors’ claim against Dade Bonded Warehouse, Inc., and issue the Rule 54(b) certificate, the appeal from that judgment may be submitted on the record and briefs prepared for this appeal, supplemented by the new judgment and certificate, and on the oral arguments heretofore heard.

Dismissed.