Dawes v. State, 135 So. 921 (Ala. Ct. App. 1931). · Go Syfert
Dawes v. State, 135 So. 921 (Ala. Ct. App. 1931). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
No syfertize treatment data for this case.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
J. C. Dawes and Emmett Gillespie
v.
State.
8 Div. 266, 267..
Alabama Court of Appeals.
Jun 30, 1931.
Published opinion
135 So. 921
Tlios. E. Knight, Jr., Atty. Gen., for the State.
Sameord.
Published
SAMEORD, J.

This case was tried before the judge sitting without a jury. After hearing the evidence the trial judge was of the opinion that both defendants were guilty of petit larceny, and rendered judgment accordingly.

The case was submitted in this court on motion of the Attorney General, without brief or argument by appellant supporting exceptions reserved on the trial.

We have examined the record for errors as required by the statute, and find none of a reversible nature. An opinion in the case is unnecessary, and, without promulgating one, we follow the rule laid down in Simmons v. State, 17 Ala. App. 153, 82 So. 643; Winford v. State, 17 Ala. App. 153, 82 So. 643; Chapman v. State, 17 Ala. App. 154, 82 So. 644.

Let the judgment be affirmed.

Affirmed.