Treatment trajectory · 1923 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1923
1974
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 5 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
Brown v. State
“Where this is the case, such expression of opinion will not be sufficient upon which to predicate a reversal.’); Tucker v. State, 28 Ala.App. 492, 494 , 188 So. 276, 277 (1939) (prosecutor’s statement, T believe he [defendant] is guilty* was a ‘mere expression of opinion by the solicitor’ and not improper remark); Gilbert v. State, 19 Ala.App. 104, 106-07 , 95 So. 502, 504 (1923) (prosecutor’s closing argument, ‘He is guilty as hell itself under this testimony, and you know it’ though not approved was ‘but the mere expression of counsel made in argument’).” “ ‘Gallow…
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
McGowan v. State
"Where this is the case, such expression of opinion will not be sufficient upon which to predicate a reversal."); Tucker v. State, 28 Ala.App. 492, 494 , 188 So. 276, 277 (1939) (prosecutor's statement, "I believe he [defendant] is guilty" was a "mere expression of opinion by the solicitor" and not improper remark); Gilbert v. State, 19 Ala.App. 104, 106-07 , 95 So. 502, 504 (1923) (prosecutor's closing argument, "He is guilty as hell itself under this testimony, and you know it" though not approved was "but the mere expression of counsel made in argument").' " Galloway v. State, 484 So.2d 119…
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
McWhorter v. State
Held: The opinion was based upon the evidence. `Where this is the case, such expression of opinion will not be sufficient upon which to predicate a reversal'); Tucker v. State, 28 Ala.App. 492, 494 , 188 So. 276, 277 (1939) (prosecutor's statement, `I believe he [defendant] is guilty' was a mere expression of opinion by the solicitor' and not improper remark); Gilbert v. State, 19 Ala.App. 104, 106-07 , 95 So. 502, 504 (1923) (prosecutor's closing argument, `He is guilty as hell itself under this testimony and you know it' though not approved was `but the mere expression of counsel made in arg…
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
Hagood v. State
Held: The opinion was based upon the evidence. `Where this is the case, such expression of opinion will not be sufficient upon which to predicate a reversal.'); Tucker v. State, 28 Ala.App. 492, 494 , 188 So. 276, 277 (1939) (prosecutor's statement, `I believe he [defendant] is guilty' was a `mere expression of opinion by the solicitor' and not improper remark); Gilbert v. State, 19 Ala. App. 104, 106-07 , 95 So. 502, 504 (1923) (prosecutor's closing argument, `He is guilty as hell itself under this testimony, and you know it' though not approved was `but the mere expression of counsel made in…
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
Price v. State
"Where this is the case, such expression of opinion will not be sufficient upon which to predicate a reversal."); Tucker v. State, 28 Ala.App. 492, 494 , 188 So. 276, 277 (1939) (prosecutor's statement, "I believe he [defendant] is guilty" was a "mere expression of opinion by the solicitor" and not improper remark); Gilbert v. State, 19 Ala.App. 104, 106-07 , 95 So. 502, 504 (1923) (prosecutor's closing argument, "He is guilty as hell itself under this testimony, and you know it" though not approved was "but the mere expression of counsel made in argument").' " Galloway v. State, 484 So.2d 119…
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Ex Parte Watts.
3 Div. 580..
Supreme Court of Alabama.
Feb 8, 1923.
Hamilton, Page & Caffey, of Brewton, for petitioner., G. W. L. Smith and Leon G. Brooks, both of Brewton, Steiner, Crum & Weil, of Montgomery, and P. L. Tate, of Wetumpka, opposed.
Somerville.
Cited by 8 opinions | Published
SOMERVILLE, J.
Petition of W. W. Watts for certiorari to the Court of Appeals to review and revise the judgment and decision- of that court in the case of County Board of Education of Escambia County v. W. W. Watts, 95 South. 498.
Writ denied.