Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. E.L. Rice & Co. of Southgate, Inc., 524 F.2d 1148 (6th Cir. 1975). · Go Syfert
Search
Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. E.L. Rice & Co. of Southgate, Inc., 524 F.2d 1148 (6th Cir. 1975). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
1 citation event across 1 distinct court.
How cited ↗
Cited for

No citing cases on record.

Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Petitioner,
v.
E. L. RICE AND COMPANY OF SOUTHGATE, INC., Respondent
74-2379.
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit.
Jun 13, 1975.
Published opinion
524 F.2d 1148
1975 U.S. App. LEXIS 14226
Elliott Moore, Deputy Associate Gen. Counsel, Michael S. Wolly, N. L. R. B., Washington, D. C., Bernard Gottfried, Director Region 7, N. L. R. B., Detroit, Mich., for petitioner., Clunet R. Lewis, Jaffe, Snider, Raitt, Garratt & Heuer, Detroit, Mich., for respondent.
Phillips, Weick, Edwards.
Cited by 1 opinion  |  Published

ORDER

On receipt and consideration of an application for enforcement of an order of the National Labor Relations Board, reported at 213 N.L.R.B. No. 99; and

On receipt and consideration of the briefs and record and oral argument in said case; and

Noting that after an impartial card check on October 17, 1973, a recognition agreement was entered into between the parties on that same date, reciting in part; “The Employer acknowledges that the Union represents a majority of employees in such bargaining unit”; and

Noting further that although the company subsequently refused to continue[*1149] recognition and bargaining, no facts were adduced at the subsequent unfair labor practice hearing constituting affirmative evidence proving a lack of majority at the time of the recognition agreement, See Moisi & Sons Trucking, Inc., 197 N.L.R.B. 198 (1972); and

Further noting the Board’s conclusion that the union is and has been the exclusive representative of the employees in the respondent’s bargaining unit and that said conclusion is supported by substantial evidence upon the whole record;

Now, therefore, the application for enforcement of the order of the Board is hereby granted.