No syfertize treatment data for this case.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
EAST COAST BAG AND METAL COMPANY, INC., a Florida Corporation,
v.
HARRY HARRIS, HANNAH HARRIS, His Wife, and JEROME HARRIS, as Co-Partners Doing Business Under the Firm Name of HARRY HARRIS & COMPANY
v.
HARRY HARRIS, HANNAH HARRIS, His Wife, and JEROME HARRIS, as Co-Partners Doing Business Under the Firm Name of HARRY HARRIS & COMPANY
Supreme Court of Florida.
Feb 27, 1942.
Published opinion
Morehead & Pallot, for plaintiff in error., Loftin, Calkins, Anderson & Scott, for defendants in error.
Adams, Brown, Buford, Whitfield.
Published
PER CURIAM:
To a bill for discovery, reformation of contract and accounting, defendant filed answer and counter-claim. The cause was referred to special master to take testimony and report findings as to whether or not plaintiff is entitled to accounting.
On coming in of master’s report, same was' approved and confirmed and chancellor entered decree dismissing bill of complaint with prejudice and dismissing counter-claim without prejudice.
The controlling question is whether or not the controlling testimony supports the master’s report and the decree.
After a careful consideration of the record in the light of the briefs and pursuant to oral argument, we find no reversible error apparent.
The decree is affirmed.
So ordered.
BROWN, C. J., WHITFIELD, BUFORD, and ADAMS, JJ., concur.