No syfertize treatment data for this case.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
M. L. Dekle, E. N. Dekle, Jno. Milton, Jr., T. D. Sanford, L. N. Trawick and Milton Land & Investment Company, Intervenors, Appellants,
v.
Special Road and Bridge District Number One, of Jackson County, Florida, Appellee
v.
Special Road and Bridge District Number One, of Jackson County, Florida, Appellee
Supreme Court of Florida.
Jun 5, 1925.
Published opinion
Carter Solomon, for Appellants;
W. E. B. Smith, for Appellee.
West, Whitfield, Terrell, Strum, Ellis.
Published
Lead Opinion
Per Curiam.
This cause having heretofore been submitted to the Court upon the transcript of the record of the decree herein, and briefs and argument of counsel for the respective parties, and the record having been seen and inspected, and the Court being now advised of its judgment to be given in the premises, it seems to the Court that there is no error in the said decree; it is, therefore, considered, ordered and adjudged by the Court that the said decree of the Circuit Court be, and the same is hereby, affirmed.
West, C. J., and Whitfield, Terrell and Strum, J. J., concur. Ellis, J., dissents.Dissent
Ellis, J.,
dissenting:
I think the judgment should be reversed. Willis v. Special Road and Bridge Dist. No. 2, 73 Fla. 446, 70 South. Rep. 495; Consolidated Land Co. v. Tyler, 88 Fla. 14, 101 South. Rep. 280.