Ramsay v. Ramsay, 168 So. 12 (Fla. 1936). · Go Syfert
Ramsay v. Ramsay, 168 So. 12 (Fla. 1936). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
No syfertize treatment data for this case.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Ethel Ramsay
v.
Joseph Gales Ramsay
Supreme Court of Florida.
May 6, 1936.
Published opinion
168 So. 12
1936 Fla. LEXIS 1102
John F. Burket, Francis C. Dart and Marvel, Morford, Ward Logan (of Wilmington, Del.) for Appellant; Whitaker Brothers, for Appellee.
Whitfield, Brown, Davis, Ellis, Terrell, Buford.
Published
Per Curiam.

Appeal from interlocutory orders of Chancery Court entered in a divorce case. The orders appealed from being within the sound discretion of the Chancellor, are affirmed on the authority of Demos v. Walker, 99 Fla. 302, 125 Sou. Rep. 305; Holly v. Holly, 81 Fla. 881, 89 Sou. Rep. 132; Floyd v. Floyd, 91 Fla. 910, 108 Sou. Rep. 896; O’Gara v. Hancock, 76 Fla. 1, 79 Sou. Rep.[*267] 167; Rausch v. Equitable Life Assurance Soc., 77 Fla. 846, 82 Sou. Rep. 295. No abuse of discretion has been made to appear.

Affirmed.

Whitfield, C. J., and Brown and Davis, J. J., concur. Ellis, P. J., and Terrell and Buford, J. J., concur in the opinion and judgment.