Clark v. Ruemmele as Exec. Etc., 136 So. 604 (Fla. 1931). · Go Syfert
Clark v. Ruemmele as Exec. Etc., 136 So. 604 (Fla. 1931). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
No syfertize treatment data for this case.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
D. W. Clark, Et Al., Appellants, vs. Hugo Ruemmele, as Exec. Etc., Appellee
Supreme Court of Florida.
Sep 14, 1931.
Published opinion
136 So. 604
J. B. Murrow, for Appellants; G. Wayne Gray, for Appellee.
Buford, Whitfield, Davis.
Published
Per Curiam.

— This cause having heretofore been submitted to the Court upon the transcript of the record of the Decree herein, and briefs and argument of counsel for the respective parties, and the record having been seen and inspected, and the Court being now advised of its judgment to be given in the premises, it seems to the Court that there is no error in the said Decree; it is, therefore, considered, ordered and adjudged by the Court that the said Decree of the Circuit Court be, and the same is hereby affirmed.

Buford, C.J., and Whitfield and Davis, J.J., concur.