James M. Connaughton v. Monsanto Co., 557 F.2d 635 (8th Cir. 1977). · Go Syfert
James M. Connaughton v. Monsanto Co., 557 F.2d 635 (8th Cir. 1977). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
No syfertize treatment data for this case.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
James M. CONNAUGHTON, Appellant,
v.
MONSANTO COMPANY, D/B/A Monsanto Commercial Products Company, a Delaware Corporation, Appellee
76-2034.
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit.
Jun 29, 1977.
Published opinion
557 F.2d 635
1977 U.S. App. LEXIS 12664
James P. Finnegan, Jr., St. Louis, Mo., for appellant., Richmond C. Coburn and Joseph A. Krai, III, Coburn, Croft, Shepherd & Herzog, St. Louis, Mo., for appellee.
Gibson, Heaney, Per Curiam, Ross.
Published
PER CURIAM.

Plaintiff, James M. Connaughton, appeals from a judgment of the District Court in favor of defendant, Monsanto Company. Plaintiff’s suit was brought under the Age Discrimination in Employment Act, 29 U.S.C. § 621 et seq. (Supp. V, 1975). Following a bench trial, the District Court entered a judgment for Monsanto. The trial judge assumed, without finding, that Connaughton had established a prima facie case and held that this case had been successfully rebutted by Monsanto’s showing that age had played no part in any of its decisions regarding Connaughton.

Upon a review of the record and of the briefs and arguments of the parties, we are convinced that the trial court’s findings of fact are not clearly erroneous and that it applied correct principles of law to the fac[*636] tual issues presented. Accordingly, we affirm on the basis of Judge Regan’s well-reasoned District Court opinion.