Reams v. Georgia Composite Bd. of Med. Examiners, 564 F.2d 95 (5th Cir. 1977). · Go Syfert
Reams v. Georgia Composite Bd. of Med. Examiners, 564 F.2d 95 (5th Cir. 1977). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
29 citation events (4 in the last 25 years) across 3 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Gabarick v. Laurin Maritime (America) Inc. (laed, 2009-05-14)
Treatment trajectory · 1977 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1977 2001 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 2 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited "see" Gabarick v. Laurin Maritime (America) Inc.
E.D. La. · 2009 · signal: see · confidence high
See Board of Commissioners of the Port of New Orleans v. M/V RACHAEL GUIDRY, 425 F.Supp. 661 (E.D.La. 1977), aff'd 564 F.2d 95 (5th Cir.1977) (holding that under the PI policy at issue, the insurer was entitled to deduct defense costs from the policy limits because the insurer had no independent duty to defend under the policy); Taylor, 1994 WL 118303 at *13 (evaluating M/V Rachael Guidry and finding that, with respect to the policy at issue in Taylor , deduction from the policy limit for costs for attorney’s fees was proper under the Excess Marine policy 11 because that policy contained no …
cited Cited "see" Donald M. Smith v. Louie L. Wainwright, Secretary, Department of Offender Rehabilitation
5th Cir. · 1978 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Bowdach, 564 F.2d 95 (5th Cir. 1977) (impeachment). 4 .
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Reams
v.
Georgia Composite Board of Medical Examiners
76-4317.
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit.
Nov 8, 1977.
564 F.2d 95
Cited by 1 opinion  |  Published

564 F.2d 95

Reams
v.
Georgia Composite Board of Medical Examiners[*]
[**]

No. 76-4317

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit

11/8/77

AFFIRMED

1

N.D.Ga.

*

Summary Calendar case; Rule 18, 5 Cir.; see Isbell Enterprises, Inc. v. Citizens Casualty Co. of New York et al., 5 Cir., 1970, 431 F.2d 409

**

Local Rule 21 case; see NLRB v. Amalgamated Clothing Workers of America, 5 Cir., 1970, 430 F.2d 966