Wallin v. Gust Lagerquist & Sons, 251 N.W. 669 (Minn. 1933). · Go Syfert
Wallin v. Gust Lagerquist & Sons, 251 N.W. 669 (Minn. 1933). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
1 citation event across 1 distinct court.
Cited for

No citing cases on record.

Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Albert Wallin
v.
Gust Lagerquist Sons and Another. [Fn1]
No. 29,698..
Supreme Court of Minnesota.
Dec 15, 1933.
Published opinion
251 N.W. 669
1933 Minn. LEXIS 925
R. D. Modeen, for relator., J. Gt. Stirn, for Gust Lagerquist & Sons, employer, and Aetna Life Insurance Company, its insurer, respondents.
<italic>PER CURIAM</italic>..
Published
PER CURIAM.

Certiorari to the industrial commission to review an order denying compensation.

The industrial commission concluded that relator had long since completed recovery from whatever disability he suffered by reason of an industrial accident August 29, 1929. He Avas totally disabled until sometime in December, 1929. He then took up light work, which he continued until April 5, 1930. Then he resumed his former occupation and April lá, 1930, executed final receipt for his compensation. In March, 1932, he was “let out” by his employers, not because of disability or claim thereof, but because they did not have the work to permit them to continue his employment. There is credible medical testimony supporting the conclusion that relator is uoav suffering no disability attributable to his accident. Having such support in the evidence, nothing more need be said to show that the decision of the industrial commission should not be disturbed.

The Avrit is discharged and the order of the commission affirmed.