Prune Bargaining Ass'n v. Bergland, 571 F.2d 1132 (9th Cir. 1978). · Go Syfert
Prune Bargaining Ass'n v. Bergland, 571 F.2d 1132 (9th Cir. 1978). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
6 citation events (1 in the last 25 years) across 4 distinct courts.
Cited for
Other citing cases2 with no pin cite or quoted language on record
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Prune Bargaining Association, a Non-Profit Cooperative Association
v.
Robert Bergland (Successor to Earl Butz), Secretary of Agriculture of the United States
75-3046.
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit.
Mar 20, 1978.
Published opinion
571 F.2d 1132
1978 U.S. App. LEXIS 12099
Cited by 2 opinions  |  Published

571 F.2d 1132

PRUNE BARGAINING ASSOCIATION, a non-profit Cooperative
Association, et al., Plaintiffs-Appellants,
v.
Robert BERGLAND (successor to Earl Butz), Secretary of
Agriculture of the United States et al.,
Defendants-Appellees.

No. 75-3046.

United States Court of Appeals,
Ninth Circuit.

March 20, 1978.

Reginald Steer, of Pillsbury, Madison & Sutro, San Francisco, Cal., Bruce I. Cornblum (argued), San Diego, Cal., for plaintiffs-appellants.

Alexis Panagakos (argued), of Dept. of Justice, Washington, D. C., for defendants-appellees.

Before DUNIWAY, WRIGHT and SNEED, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

[*~1132–1133]1

The judgment appealed from is affirmed for the reasons stated by Judge Orrick in his Memorandum Opinion, Prune Bargaining Association v. Butz, N.D.Cal., 1975, 444 F.Supp. 785. We add only that the judge did, on motion for new trial, consider appellants' "Corrected Exhibit C." As to that exhibit, he said:

2

(S)o far as the newly discovered evidence goes, I think it's inconsequential, at best, the changes in the figures and irrelevant at the least.

3

(R.T. 198.)

4

He was right.

5

Affirmed.