neutral
Cited (no substantive treatment)
published
0.2 score
Cited for
No citing cases on record.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
William T. Newbury, Appellant,
v.
Ruliff v. Lawrence, Judge, Etc., Et Al., Respondents
v.
Ruliff v. Lawrence, Judge, Etc., Et Al., Respondents
Supreme Court of New Jersey.
Sep 16, 1926.
Published opinion
For the appellant, James Mercer Davis.
For the respondents, Stokes McDermott.
PER CURIAM..
Cited by 2 opinions | Published
Per. Curiam.
The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the per curiam opinion delivered in the Supreme Court.
For affirmance — The Chief Justice, Parker, Minturn, Kalisch, Black, Campbell, White, Van Buskirk, McGlennon, Kays, Hetfield, JJ. 11.
For reversal — Hone.