Van Schaick v. Friedman, 188 N.E. 100 (NY 1933). · Go Syfert
Search
Van Schaick v. Friedman, 188 N.E. 100 (NY 1933). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
3 citation events across 3 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Grunenthal v. Long Island Rail Road (nysd, 1967-04-10)
Top citers, strongest first. 1 distinct citer. How cited ↗
cited Cited "see" Grunenthal v. Long Island Rail Road
S.D.N.Y. · 1967 · signal: see · confidence high
See Van Deusen v. Ruhtz-Pike Engineering and Construction Corp., 238 A.D. 178 , 264 N.Y.S. 395 (3d Dept. 1933), appeal dismissed, 262 N.Y. 639 , 188 N.E. 100 (1933).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
George S. Van Schaick, as Superintendent of Insurance of the State of New York, Liquidator of the Equitable Casualty and Surety Company, Respondent,
v.
Samuel D. Friedman Et Al., Doing Business Under the Firm Name of Friedman Bros. & Co., Appellants
New York Court of Appeals.
Oct 10, 1933.
188 N.E. 100
Abraham Benedict for motion. Abraham J. Halprin opposed.
Published

Motion denied, with ten dollars costs and necessary printing disbursements.