Treatment trajectory · 1904 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1904
1965
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 3 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
Miller, Etc. v. Ortman, Etc.
This he may do by contract 14 or in the absence of a contract he may protect the business against any conspiracy to destroy and appropriate it by tortious and unlawful acts. 15 *671 In the case of Jackson et al. v. Stanfield (1893), 137 Ind. 592, 608-609, 613 , 36 N. E. 345, 350, 351 , 37 N. E. 14 , supra, the law applicable to a conspiracy to destroy a man’s business is set forth as follows: "...
cited
Cited "see"
Reeves v. Decorah Farmer's Cooperative Society
See Jackson v. Stanfield, 137 Ind. 592 ( 36 N. E. 345 , 37 N. E. 14 , 23 L.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Winkler v. V.G. Reed & Sons, Inc.
See, e.g., Jackson v. Stanfield (1893), 137 Ind. 592 , 36 N.E. 345 (lumber association liable to independent retailer when association influenced wholesalers not to deal with retailer, thereby preventing the retailer from fulfilling a favorable order from Studebaker Corporation); Fort Wayne *1235 Cleaners & Dyers Ass'n v. Price (1956), 127 Ind.App. 13 , 137 N.E.2d 738 (association of dry cleaners enjoined from fixing prices for the dry cleaning business and from interfering with plaintiff independent dry cleaner's employees).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
William J. Brewster, Appellant,
v.
George H. Wooster, Respondent
v.
George H. Wooster, Respondent
New York Court of Appeals.
Jan 30, 1894.
William H. Arnoux for appellant.
Thomas G. Shearman for respondent.
Published
Agree to affirm ; no opinion.
All concur.
Order affirmed.