Matheson v. Wharton, 48 N.E. 1105 (N.Y. 1897). · Go Syfert
Search
Matheson v. Wharton, 48 N.E. 1105 (N.Y. 1897). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
10 citation events across 8 distinct courts.
How cited ↗
Cited for

No citing cases on record.

Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Adam S. Matheson Et Al., as Receivers of the American Tube and Iron Company, Appellants,
v.
Clifton Wharton, Jr., as Assignee of Jacob Jamer, Etc., and the National Tube Works Company, Respondents
New York Court of Appeals.
Jun 8, 1897.
Published opinion
48 N.E. 1105
1897 N.Y. LEXIS 776
Edgar J. Nathan and Michael H. Cardozo for appellants. Alfred Jaretzki and James McKeen for respondents.
Published

Order affirmed and judgment absolute ordered against the appellants, with costs, on opinion below.

All concur, except Andrews, Ch. J., not voting.