Curtis v. Hudson Valley Ry. Co., 107 N.E. 1075 (N.Y. 1915). · Go Syfert
Search
Curtis v. Hudson Valley Ry. Co., 107 N.E. 1075 (N.Y. 1915). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
4 citation events across 3 distinct courts.
How cited ↗
Cited for

No citing cases on record.

Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Mary L. N. Curtis, as Executrix of Pierson C. Curtis, Deceased, Respondent,
v.
Hudson Valley Railway Company, Appellant
New York Court of Appeals.
Jan 5, 1915.
Published opinion
107 N.E. 1075
1915 N.Y. LEXIS 1482
Lewis E. Carr and James McPhillips for appellant. Edgar T. Brackett and John B. Holmes for respondent.
Published

Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.

Concur: Willard Bartlett, Ch. J., Chase, Hogan, Miller and Cardozo, JJ.; Hiscock, J., dissents on the ground that improper evidence was received that the whistle did not blow and concerning the earnings of the decedent.