Matter of Orlando v. Rosen, Fishkin, 8 N.E.2d 609 (N.Y. 1937). · Go Syfert
Matter of Orlando v. Rosen, Fishkin, 8 N.E.2d 609 (N.Y. 1937). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
No syfertize treatment data for this case.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
In the Matter of the Claim of Vincenzo Orlando Against Hyman Rosen Et Al., Appellants, and Zach Fishkin Et Al., Respondents. State Industrial Board, Respondent
New York Court of Appeals.
Apr 27, 1937.
Published opinion
8 N.E.2d 609
1937 N.Y. LEXIS 869
William S. Sinclair and James J. Mahoney for appellants. William Warren Dimmick for Zach Fishkin et al., respondents. John J. Bennett, Jr., Attorney-General ( Roy Wiedersum of counsel), for State Industrial Board, respondent.
Published

Order of Appellate Division and award of State Industrial Board reversed, with costs, and matter remitted to State Industrial Board to proceed in accordance with opinion in Matter of Garelick v. Rosen (274 N. Y. 64). No opinion.

Concur: Hubbs, Loughran, Finch and Rippey, JJ. Dissenting: Crane, Ch. J., Lehman and O’Brien, JJ.