Murray v. Nat'l Sur. Co., 171 N.E. 776 (N.Y. 1930). · Go Syfert
Murray v. Nat'l Sur. Co., 171 N.E. 776 (N.Y. 1930). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
No syfertize treatment data for this case.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Patrick H. Murray, Respondent,
v.
National Surety Company, Appellant
New York Court of Appeals.
Mar 18, 1930.
Published opinion
171 N.E. 776
1930 N.Y. LEXIS 912
John T. Norton and Benjamin McClung for appellant. William H. Murray and John F. Murray for respondent.
Published

Judgment of the Appellate Division reversed and that of the Trial Term affirmed, with costs in this court and in the Appellate Division, on the ground that the preponderance of evidence sustains the finding of the trial judge that the written contract fails to express the agreement of the parties and should be reformed as the consequence of mutual mistake; no opinion.

Concur: Cardozo, Ch. J., Pound, Crane, Lehman, Kellogg, O’Brien and Hubbs, JJ.