People v. Dunn, Gentile, 84 N.E.2d 635 (N.Y. 1949). · Go Syfert
Search
People v. Dunn, Gentile, 84 N.E.2d 635 (N.Y. 1949). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
1 citation event across 1 distinct court.
How cited ↗
Cited for

No citing cases on record.

Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
The People of the State of New York, Respondent,
v.
John M. Dunn and Daniel Gentile, Alias Danny Brooks, Appellants
New York Court of Appeals.
Feb 24, 1949.
Published opinion
84 N.E.2d 635
Bernard Hershkopf and Hyman Barshay for John M. Dunn, appellant. Harry G. Anderson and Vincent Tese for Daniel Gentile, appellant. Frank S. Hogan, District Attorney ( Whitman Knapp and William Hoppen of counsel), for respondent.
Loughban, Lewis, Conway, Fuld, Desmond, Dye.
Cited by 1 opinion  |  Published

Upon reargument of appeals by appellants John M. Dunn and Daniel Gentile: Judgments of conviction affirmed. No opinion.

Concur: LoughbaN, Ch. J., Lewis, CoNway and Fuld, JJ. DesmoNd and Dye, JJ., dissent, and vote to reverse and order a new trial on the ground that the newly discovered evidence could well change the result if presented to a jury and, accordingly, should he so presented. [See 298 N. Y. 564, 706, 929.]