Caldwell v. . Mut. Reserve Fund Life Ass'n, 61 N.E. 1128 (N.Y. 1901). · Go Syfert
Caldwell v. . Mut. Reserve Fund Life Ass'n, 61 N.E. 1128 (N.Y. 1901). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
No syfertize treatment data for this case.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Dimont M. Caldwell, Appellant,
v.
Mutual Reserve Fund Life Association, Respondent
New York Court of Appeals.
Dec 10, 1901.
Published opinion
61 N.E. 1128
1901 N.Y. LEXIS 816
Herman Aaron for motion. George Burnham, Jr., opposed.
<italic>Per Curiam</italic>..
Published
Per Curiam.

Motion denied, unless appellant pays to the respondent the costs and charges of keeping in force its undertaking, on appeal to the Appellate Division, from the date of the entry of the order reversing the judgment in that court to the date of the entry of an order in this court permitting the withdrawal of this appeal, together with costs and disbursements in this court to the time of such withdrawal ; in which case motion granted.

[*577] In case the appellant complies with these conditions, the order, if not agreed upon by the parties, may be settled before Werner, J., upon five days’ notice.

Parker, Ch. J., Gray, Bartlett, Martin, Vann, Cullen and Werner, JJ., concur.