In Re the Acct. of Mulligan, 111 N.E. 1092 (N.Y. 1915). · Go Syfert
Search
In Re the Acct. of Mulligan, 111 N.E. 1092 (N.Y. 1915). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
6 citation events across 3 distinct courts.
How cited ↗
Cited for

No citing cases on record.

Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
In the Matter of the Accounting of Agnes K. Mulligan, as Executrix of John Hartmann, Deceased, Appellant. Mary K. Hartmann, Respondent
New York Court of Appeals.
Dec 7, 1915.
Published opinion
111 N.E. 1092
1915 N.Y. LEXIS 940
Albert Massey and William G. Mulligan for appellant. Gilbert D. Lamb and James W. Osborne for respondent.
Published

Order affirmed, with costs against the executrix personally; no opinion.

Concur: Willard Bartlett, Ch. J., Chase, Collin, Cardozo, Seabury and Pound, JJ. Not sitting: His-cock, J.